How Good or Bad is the Midfield?

April 18th, 2006 | By: Lyle | 14 Comments »

What do you guys think? It seems to be common sense that Mother Serbia’s soccer boys are “weakest” in the center of the field. Is this true? Are they really “weak”, or is it that the back four is so good and the forwards so well-known that people assume the midfield is mediocre?



Related Posts


Subscribe
 

rss icon Serbia World Cup RSS Feed

Print
Print this article
Share
del.icio.us:How Good or Bad is the Midfield? digg:How Good or Bad is the Midfield? newsvine:How Good or Bad is the Midfield? reddit:How Good or Bad is the Midfield? fark:How Good or Bad is the Midfield? Y!:How Good or Bad is the Midfield? stumbleupon:How Good or Bad is the Midfield?

Comments
Username By Gibraldo | April 18th, 2006 at 1:57 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Ok let`s face it.

If you would make a top ten list of midfielders in this seasons CL, Stankovic would surely fit in.

Sasa Ilic currently leads Galatasaray to turkisch championchip by scoring a lot of goals.

P. Djordevic won his 23th greek championchip with olympiakos these days and is topscorer in the league, afaik.

I don`t want to start talking about rambo petkovic and what brazilians think about him.

But then, there is a rapid break.
Vukic, Duljaj, Nadj, Mladenovic or Koroman lack of creativity and form. Some of them are no regular starters in their teams.

So, if the important players are up and running, it is a good midfield, a well underestimated even.

cornercorner
Username By Crno Gorac | April 18th, 2006 at 3:57 pm
top comment
cornercorner

agreed with Gibraldo.

All we need is Koroman to hit top form, and were top classs

Posted from Australia Australia

cornercorner
Username By Lyle | April 18th, 2006 at 5:20 pm
top comment
cornercorner

i figured as much. but they obviously tone down the offense and focus on total defense, so maybe an out-of-form, non-creative fourth midfielder isn’t really required.

regardless… this team looks good. i pity the dutch, argentinians, and africans. the least respected of the bunch might actually do the best.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By rogi32 | April 19th, 2006 at 4:11 am
top comment
cornercorner

excuse me gilbrado, but why do you mention Igor Duljaj? He is a terriffic defensive midfielder, any team would like to have in a squad. He is a worker, very disciplined and irreplacable in the defensive midfield. This player is not mediocre at all….so i dont understand what your talking about here…

Posted from Germany Germany

cornercorner
Username By Gibraldo | April 19th, 2006 at 6:58 am
top comment
cornercorner

Igor Duljaj is a solid defensive midfielder of course, but if every team would like to have him in his squad, he woudn`t been benched from time to time at Dynamo Kiev but would play at a top club in Italy, England or France.

He is certainly above, the other mentioned “mediocre” players, but nothing more.

Posted from Germany Germany

cornercorner
Username By rogi32 | April 19th, 2006 at 7:35 am
top comment
cornercorner

First of all: Duljaj plays for Shakhtar Donetsk and not for Dynamo Kiev. Are you mixing him up with Gavrancic (he was injured and is a defensive player and not a midfielder).
Second: Duljaj is a regular standard player at Shakthtar. He was not benched since ages.
Sorry, but your simply wrong informed here !
Third: Shakhtar is a very good team, which they have proven a couple of times already in the European competitions. they can win against italian, german or english teams, who qualify for the UEFA Cup, which they also did!

Posted from Germany Germany

cornercorner
Username By Lyle | April 19th, 2006 at 8:28 am
top comment
cornercorner

Keep bringing the knowledge guys.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By Crno Gorac | April 19th, 2006 at 1:27 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Lyle…I didnt know how to contact you. But please make a post about the following player.

His name is Nikon Jevtic and he is 13 years old. He plays for Valencias youth teams and is one of the brightest prospects for our nation. Here is a video of the little genius.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLxXjSvk5Ls

Posted from Australia Australia

cornercorner
Username By Gibraldo | April 19th, 2006 at 1:45 pm
top comment
cornercorner

You are right, he plays for Shaktjor. I know that, I just mixed it up.

Duljaj is not a bad player, but Shaktjor is no big teams. he is solid, but he needs to prove on international level and i have some doubts, that he can do that against riquelme, van der vaart and those elephants within 10 days.

cornercorner
Username By Lyle | April 19th, 2006 at 5:54 pm
top comment
cornercorner

crno,

thanks for the heads up.

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By rogi32 | April 20th, 2006 at 5:41 am
top comment
cornercorner

Gibraldo, ok we have a different opinion here. Shaktar are currently leading the Ukrainian league and were 2 times Ukrainian title and Cup winner since Duljaj plays for them. They beat teams like Schalke, VfB Stuttgart, Rennes, Brügge, Celtic, Barcelona in the last 2 years. They also lost to teams like Inter, but as i said, this team can compete on a high European club level, and Duljaj is one of the cornerstone on the midfield there since more than 2 years. So your view on this isssue is - sorry to say - completely wrong, as you dont seem to have a clue about Ukrainian football.

Posted from Germany Germany

cornercorner
Username By Mike | April 20th, 2006 at 10:35 am
top comment
cornercorner

Why don’t the midfielders play for bigger clubs if they are so good? Its great that they can beat middle of the road European teams and occasionally beat a good one (Barca) but leagues like the ones you’re talking about tend to have their best players bought by big clubs. How do you account for that?

Posted from United States United States

cornercorner
Username By rogi32 | April 20th, 2006 at 2:29 pm
top comment
cornercorner

Mike, in the case of Duljaj I just dont accept arguments calling him “avarage” or “mediocre”. Above that…I appreciate teams like Shakthar who might play in a weak league, but still have a good team, which, as I already said, they have already proven in the last 2 years. they might not compete with Real or Chelsea, but they can beat any european club who qiualifies for UEFA - English, German, French, Italian, Spanish. thta makes them indeed a strong team. So i dont know what your talking about either. I suspect rather that you have the usual West European “blind eye” towards successful East European teams, like Steaua for example. A terrific team with technically superb players! They are UEAFA Cup semi-finalists!

Posted from Germany Germany

cornercorner
Username By Seger | April 25th, 2006 at 10:32 am
top comment
cornercorner

Dear Mike,

I suppose you are unfamiliar with the following fact…

Most of the big european leagues are located in the European Union which SerbiaMontenegro isn’t part of. The EU has created rules for non-EU players, for example Spanish teams can only have 4 players without EU-citizenship.

Most southamerican players get EU passports by proving some family ties to EU countries (mostly Spain, Portugal, Italy, Germany and France).

Posted from Denmark Denmark

cornercorner


Comments are closed


 
Go to WCB Homepage


Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for World Cup Blog?
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org

Serbia Club Football News

Did You Know? Formerly part of Yugoslavia and a un ...
Price: $49.99

Powered by

More Europe Blogs

Monthly Archives

closer
World Cup Blog